This paper traces the various administrative and legislative steps in the reform of the motor carrier industry and their effects on the return to investors. The author concludes by asking whether the reduced return is an elimination of monopoly rents, or whether the previous earnings arose partly from the additional obligations placed on motor carriers.

Problems associated with subsidising Australian non-urban rail services are revisited by evaluating the macro-economic impacts of a policy that would eliminate railway deficits. The model used demonstrates how several policy scenarios for the abolition of railway subsidies can be explored by simulating shocks to the economy. The results illustrate the range of economic benefits that could accrue from the abolition of subsidies and identifies interests most likely to benefit or lose from such a policy.