Congestion Charges and Welfare: Some Answers to Sharps’s Doubts

Congestion Charges and Welfare: Some Answers to Sharps’s Doubts

In the Economic Journal, December 1966 (Vol. 76, pp 806-17), Clifford Sharp questioned some of the benefits to be expected from a congestion tax, as set out in the Smeed Report, Professor Vickrey seeks to answer his doubts, and Dr. Sharp makes his position clearer.

Share Content

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Related Articles

Optimal Public transport Price and Service Frequency

Because values of time and passenger behaviour depend on the level of frequency it is found that: (1) in urban public transport there may be one low-deficit local optimum and one high-deficit local optimum, one of which is global; (2) contrary to what might be expected, optimal financial deficit per passenger is typically larger for high frequency services than for low-frequency services; (3) the optimal off-peak may exceed the optimal peak price.

View Journal »