Competition and the Structure of Local Bus Markets

Competition and the Structure of Local Bus Markets

The aim of entry is to capture monopoly profits by displacing the incumbent or colluding. However, entrants have generally failed to do this. Incumbents have better local knowledge, and are often financially stronger. Contrary to the Government\'s expectation on deregulation, the effect of potential entrants in controlling monopoly operators is weak.

Share Content

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Articles

Economies of Scale in Bus transport: I. Some British Municipal Results

This study was prompted by the proposal to merge a number of municipal transport undertakings into Passenger transport Authorities. The authors analyse figures showing various working expenses per bus-mile, and find no evidence of scale economies. They point out, however, that the P.T.A.s will be larger than any undertaking in their sample, and that a different conclusion might conceivably be reached if data were available on costs per passenger-mile. Extension of one-man operation appears to offer greater scope for economies than amalgamation.

View Journal »

Alternative Tendering Systems and Deregulation in Britain

When UK bus services were deregulated in 1985 a system of competitive tendering was introduced for the provision of socially necessary services. Payment to the operator can be either the net difference between cost and revenue or the gross (total) cost of the service. While the former is attractive, a comparison of both methods indicates the overall cost to the contracting authority is generally lower under the gross cost method, due to the reduced risk perceived by the operator.

View Journal »

The Cost of Bus Operations in Norway

This study investigates the efficiency of Norwegian bus companies. The developed model permits the consideration of the effects on costs for differences in scale, technological conditions, ownership structure and subsidy policy.

View Journal »