Aviation Deregulation and Safety. Theory and Evidence

Aviation Deregulation and Safety. Theory and Evidence

Deregulation of US aviation has not been followed by a marked increase in accidents. But there is evidence that safety has been impaired by failure to expand infrastructure and surveillance to keep pace with the increase in numbers of travelers.

Share Content

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on google
Google+
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn

Related Articles

Values of Risk Reduction Implied by Motorist Use of Protection Equipment

This study derives the implied values of reducing the risks of fatal and non-fatal injuries for different road user populations. Values are obtained for “typical” adults, children (as implied by their parents’ actions) and adults who ride motorcycles. Also considered is whether individuals evaluate small time increments consistently with larger time allocations.

View Journal »

External Cost Estimates of Road traffic Accidents: An International Comparison

The study compares the external costs of road traffic accidents in different European countries and finds substantial differences in the external costs per vehicle-kilometre. It also finds that lorries and buses generate substantially higher external costs than passenger cars because pedestrians, cyclists, motor-cycle riders, and the occupants of passenger cars, face greater hazards from lorries and buses when a collision occurs.

View Journal »

Safety in Sea transport

This paper discusses the development of safety regulation in sea transport. It suggests that international competitive forces and regulatory capture, coupled with the slow and uneven effects of international conventions, has led to a sub-optimal level of ship safety. Reforms are therefore needed based on a systematic programme of cost-benefit analysis, involving higher quality of information.

View Journal »